.
Feedback

Authorities Call CL&P Response 'Deficient and Inadequate'

A state board released the findings of its investigation into Connecticut Light & Power's work during the past two storms.

The Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority slammed Connecticut Light & Power in a draft decision analyzing the utility company’s response to two storms.  

PURA, calling CL&P “deficient and inadequate,” said on Tuesday that these findings will be taken into consideration when it rules on the next rate request from CL&P and on any request  for recovery of costs it incurred as a result of the storms. Northeast Utilities is the parent company of CL&P, and one of two

Shelton, which is served by United Illuminating, was also hit by Tropical Storm Irene and the Halloween nor'easter. Trees were toppled throughout town, and for some, electricy was out for days both times.

“Last year’s storms were a nightmare for Connecticut residents, and the response from Northeast Utilities was unacceptable. Today, PURA is echoing the earlier findings of the Two Storm Panel, the Witt report, and hundreds of thousands of Connecticut residents who experienced extended power outages after each storm,” Malloy said.

CL&P can challenge PURA’s draft decision before the agency finalizes the report on Aug. 1. A spokesman for the utility, however, said CL&P is unsure if it will do so.

"We are in the process of reviewing all 117 pages of the document and will decide if we will file written exceptions or participate in oral arguments in front of the commissioners before they issue their final decision on August 1," Mitch Gross, a CL&P spokesman, told the Connecticut Mirror.

The draft decision also ordered CL&P to develop a plan to establish a “heightened state of readiness” in preparation for future storms. The reports also asks the company to take steps to address issues such as tree trimming, communications and securing mutual assistance.

“This draft is a positive step toward ensuring better quality of service and fair compensation for residents, ratepayers and municipalities,” said Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen in a statement.

The PURA draft decision did not specify potential sanctions for other public service companies, including United illuminating (UI), the state’s second largest electric distribution company. PURA did, however, reserve the right to take UI’s storm performance into consideration when reviewing any future request by that company for recovery of 2011storm-related costs.

The full report 123-page report is attached to this article.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Shelton Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:47 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? WithRead More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel no include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" is fallacious and disingenuous.