.
Feedback

Shelton Man, 92, Dies After Crash

Police released the information Monday afternoon.

A 92-year-old man involved in a crash on Walnut Tree Hill Monday morning succumbed to his injuries later in the day, police said.

"Shelton Police were dispatched to Walnut Tree Hill Rd by Short Street for a two-car motor vehicle accident. The Fire Department and EMS were also sent because it was reported that one person was unable to get out of the vehicle due to the damage to the door," said Shelton Police Lt. Bob Kozlowsky. 

The man did not have any visible injures and was conscious and communicative at the scene, but was transported to the hospital after complaining of chest pain, police said.

The driver of the Mazda, a 24-year-old Shelton resident, claimed minor injuries from the accident, police said.

"The initial investigation by police revealed that the driver of the Honda was exiting a driveway when his vehicle collided with a Mazda traveling north on Walnut Tree Hill Road," Kozlowsky said.

The Shelton Police Traffic Division Reconstruction Team is currently investigating this accident. Any witnesses or persons with additional information may call the Shelton Police Traffic Division at 203-924-1544. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Shelton Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:47 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? WithRead More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel no include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" is fallacious and disingenuous.