.
Feedback

No Deaths on State Roads Over the New Year's Holiday

State police today issued their final stats on the holiday traffic enforcements across the state.

The Connecticut state police today issued final statistics for their statewide New Year’s enforcement operation that started Dec. 29 and ended on midnight Tuesday.

While there were hundreds of accidents on state and local roads during that period, no fatalities were reported.

Troopers were assigned to patrol both highways and secondary roads and target drunk driving along with other motor vehicle violations that could cause accidents.

Troopers manned sobriety checkpoints and were assigned to specific areas where higher then normal DUI accidents and arrests have taken place in the past.

They reported the following motor vehicle statistics from the operation:

  • 419 accidents (many resulting from Saturday’s snowstorm) resulting in 41 injuries and no deaths.
  • 44 arrests for driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol.
  • 576 citations issued for speeding.
  • 42 tickets for seatbelt violations and 1,129 tickets for moving violations, such as following too close, use of a cell phone while driving and unsafe lane changes.

State police are still encouraging motorists to call 911 if they see a suspected drunk driver and believe that a true emergency exists.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Shelton Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:47 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? WithRead More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel no include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" is fallacious and disingenuous.