.
Feedback

'I'm Thrilled, How About You?'

The best of today's comments from Patch account-holders in your town and neighboring communities.

DARIEN: "Great - so the taxpayers and the survivors of these convicted vermin can support them with 3 hots, a cot and pretty fair medical coverage for the rest of their days. I'm thrilled, how about you? Also-the fact that the pols all agreed to set this controversial issue aside during the Cheshire Home Invasion case shows that deep down - a plurality agree the death penalty is the right course of action in certain cases." wrote this in response to news the .

GREENWICH: "Bullying is a parenting issue. Programs such as this are just another manifestation of the nanny state mentality, created as an opportunity to jump in where parents have failed. If the bullying issue is going to be solved en masse, the two parent family must be maintained and held up as the norm for raising children. I was bullied as a child, and in every case (all three) it turned out that the one doing the bullying came from an abusive family. 'The nature of a bully is a tyrant, the nature of a tyrant is a coward'" wrote this in response to an article about

RIDGEFIELD: "Welcome to CT the liberal state where you are just a number [if] someone blows away a loved one. DEMS THEY SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF THEMSELVES. No guts whatsoever. Thanks John Frey and Tony for your NO VOTES." also responded to

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Shelton Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:47 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? WithRead More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel no include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" is fallacious and disingenuous.