On behalf of the City of Shelton, Mayor Mark Lauretti invites interested property owners to a powerpoint presentation outlining the City of Shelton’s Housing Rehabilitation program on Thursday, January 17, at 7:00 p.m. in the Auditorium, Shelton City Hall, 54 Hill Street, Shelton, CT 06484. The City of Shelton has had a long standing housing rehabilitation program, but has been newly awarded $300,000 from HUD and DECD to fund housing rehabilitation projects for low and moderate income Shelton property owners. Funds will be used to assist eligible low and moderate income Shelton property owners in making needed health and safety improvements to their homes. Loans are indefinitely deferred and are repaid only at change of title to home. Allowable project types, among others, include ADA modifications; roof replacement; energy efficiency upgrades; window replacement; furnace replacements; lead remediation; hazard removal; septic repair or replacement; code compliance, and electrical and plumbing upgrades. Applications will be available at the powerpoint presentation and are also posted on the City’s website, Community Development link. Applications will be served on a first come, first serve basis. For further information please call Charlene DeFilippo, Community Development Director, 203-924-1555, x374 or Helen Chung, Program Manager, Lisa Low & Associates (Housing Rehab Consultants), 203-888-5624.
$300,000 Available in Housing Rehabilitation Assistance to Shelton Property Owners
Shelton See map
Comments + Leave a Comment
Boards
All Boards »
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:47 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? With…Read More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel no include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" is fallacious and disingenuous.